RealHonestNews.com

Chris Coates Testifies About Black Panthers & DOJ (Department of Justice) Ignoring Voter Intimidation

Video (long video) but worth your time to see and hear the gross manipulation of prejudice  by the Obama's Administration.

People, this is not a President that wants to work together to achieve a better future for The United States of America.  It seems that he is out to destroy this country.

PJTV:  Has presented this video so the "American Citizen" have a chance to understand what is happening to this country today.

Sad Isn't It? 

Not Natural Born -- TRUTH MATTERS

NOT NATURAL BORN ... This is not going away.

This is a newly produced video that still professes that Barack Hussein Obama is not a "Natural Born Citizen".

It is worth the few minutes of watching.  This country is at "War" and I feel it is from within.

  

Sad Isn't It?

The video starts out with some content from obamasnippets.com, which, of course is contrived. And yet, there seems to be a synthetic truth about what the president says. Is he "natural born" according to the Constitution? No. The requirement is that BOTH parents need to be U. S. Citizens. Two U. S. Citizen parents produce a "natural born" citizen. It's likely that Mr. Obama was REGISTERED in Hawaii, therefore he has a COLB from Hawaii. The truth may well be he was born in Kenya; that is where we believe his "long-form" birth certificate was issued. Nevertheless, "natural born" indicates, and speaks to the fact that BOTH parents have to be U. S. Citizens. His father WAS NEVER a U. S. Citizen, therefore, Barack Hussein Obama is NOT a "natural born" Citizen of the United States, thus he is in violation of Amendment 14, and Article II, Section 1, Paragraph 5 of the United States Constitution.

---- ooo ----

How Many Members Of The U.S. Congress ... Are Self-Declared Socialists?

How Many Members Of The U.S. Congress
Are Self-Declared Socialists?

Updated for the 111th Congress

The following FAQ will help clarify a few facts:

Q: What is the Socialist International?

A:  It is the worldwide organization of socialist, social democratic and labor parties. It currently brings together 131 political parties and organizations from all continents. Its origins go back to the early international organizations of the labor movement of the last century.* It has existed in its present form since 1951, when it was re-established at the Frankfurt Congress. They are now headquartered in London, England.

* In 1864, representatives of English and French industrial workers founded the International Workingmen's Association in London. Karl Marx, who was living in London at the time, became the First International's dominant figure. Marx's doctrines were revived in the 20th century by Russian revolutionary Vladimir Ilich Lenin, who developed and applied them – and we all know that what was started as a labor movement ended up as the biggest totalitarian/communist state, i.e., the USSR.

Q: What is the Democratic Socialists of America [DSA]?

A: It is the largest socialist organization in the United States, and the principal U.S. affiliate of the Socialist International. Their website is http://www.dsausa.org/dsa.html 

Q: What are seven principles behind what the DSA's calls it's "Progressive Challenge?"

Dignified Work
Environmental Justice
Economic Redistribution
Democratic Participation
Community Empowerment
Global Non-Violence
Social Justice.

Never mind their soothing-sounding leftist doublespeak like 'Environmental Justice' (whatever that is supposed to mean) or the soft & fuzzy 'Global Non-Violence' (a euphemism for unilateral disarmament) — the DSA's self-declared principle of 'Economic Redistribution' clearly shows where these folks are coming from and exactly where they plan to take America.

Q: How many members of the U.S. Congress are also members of the DSA?

A: Seventy!

Q: How many of the DSA members sit on the Judiciary Committee?

A: Eleven: John Conyers [Chairman of the Judiciary Committee], Tammy Baldwin, Jerrold Nadler, Luis Gutierrez, Melvin Watt, Maxine Waters, Hank Johnson, Steve Cohen, Barbara Lee, Robert Wexler, Linda Sanchez [there are 23 Democrats on the Judiciary Committee of which eleven, almost half, are now members of the DSA].

Q: Who are these members of Congress?

A: See the listing below

Co-Chairs

Hon. Raúl M. Grijalva (AZ-07)

Hon. Lynn Woolsey (CA-06)

Vice Chairs

Hon. Diane Watson (CA-33)

Hon. Sheila Jackson-Lee (TX-18)

Hon. Mazie Hirono (HI-02)

Hon. Dennis Kucinich (OH-10)

Senate Members

Hon. Bernie Sanders (VT)

House Members

Hon. Neil Abercrombie (HI-01)

Hon. Tammy Baldwin (WI-02)

Hon. Xavier Becerra (CA-31)

Hon. Madeleine Bordallo (GU-AL)

Hon. Robert Brady (PA-01)

Hon. Corrine Brown (FL-03)

Hon. Michael Capuano (MA-08)

Hon. André Carson (IN-07)

Hon. Donna Christensen (VI-AL)

Hon. Yvette Clarke (NY-11)

Hon. William “Lacy” Clay (MO-01)

Hon. Emanuel Cleaver (MO-05)

Hon. Steve Cohen (TN-09)

Hon. John Conyers (MI-14)

Hon. Elijah Cummings (MD-07)

Hon. Danny Davis (IL-07)

Hon. Peter DeFazio (OR-04)

Hon. Rosa DeLauro (CT-03)

Rep. Donna F. Edwards (MD-04)

Hon. Keith Ellison (MN-05)

Hon. Sam Farr (CA-17)

Hon. Chaka Fattah (PA-02)

Hon. Bob Filner (CA-51)

Hon. Barney Frank (MA-04)

Hon. Marcia L. Fudge (OH-11)

Hon. Alan Grayson (FL-08)

Hon. Luis Gutierrez (IL-04)

Hon. John Hall (NY-19)

Hon. Phil Hare (IL-17)

Hon. Maurice Hinchey (NY-22)

Hon. Michael Honda (CA-15)

Hon. Jesse Jackson, Jr. (IL-02)

Hon. Eddie Bernice Johnson (TX-30)

Hon. Hank Johnson (GA-04)

Hon. Marcy Kaptur (OH-09)

Hon. Carolyn Kilpatrick (MI-13)

Hon. Barbara Lee (CA-09)

Hon. John Lewis (GA-05)

Hon. David Loebsack (IA-02)

Hon. Ben R. Lujan (NM-3)

Hon. Carolyn Maloney (NY-14)

Hon. Ed Markey (MA-07)

Hon. Jim McDermott (WA-07)

Hon. James McGovern (MA-03)

Hon. George Miller (CA-07)

Hon. Gwen Moore (WI-04)

Hon. Jerrold Nadler (NY-08)

Hon. Eleanor Holmes-Norton (DC-AL)

Hon. John Olver (MA-01)

Hon. Ed Pastor (AZ-04)

Hon. Donald Payne (NJ-10)

Hon. Chellie Pingree (ME-01)

Hon. Charles Rangel (NY-15)

Hon. Laura Richardson (CA-37)

Hon. Lucille Roybal-Allard (CA-34)

Hon. Bobby Rush (IL-01)

Hon. Linda Sánchez (CA-47)

Hon. Jan Schakowsky (IL-09)

Hon. José Serrano (NY-16)

Hon. Louise Slaughter (NY-28)

Hon. Pete Stark (CA-13)

Hon. Bennie Thompson (MS-02)

Hon. John Tierney (MA-06)

Hon. Nydia Velazquez (NY-12)

Hon. Maxine Waters (CA-35)

Hon. Mel Watt (NC-12)

Hon. Henry Waxman (CA-30)

Hon. Peter Welch (VT-AL)

Hon. Robert Wexler (FL-19)

Source: Congressional Progressive Caucus

How Did America Get To This Point?

Sad Isn't It?

--- ooo ---

Forgetting The Troups

Forgetting the Troops ... by Jack Hunter, www.southernavenger.com

Jack Hunter is a very in-depth writer and I feel he has a good pulse on politics.  A person that is well worth your time reading and listening to.  Information straight forward and to the point.  He may be a conservative commentator however Jack Hunter is a "True Old Fashioned Journalists".  And why aren't there more journalists like him?

Just take a minute to reflect on what Jack has said.

Thank you for your time.

---- ooo ----

Chuck DeVore rises to debate against MASSIVE California Tax Hikes

Chuck DeVore rises to debate against MASSIVE California Tax Hikes!

Is this what our politicians are suppose to say.  Then by saying it ... does this mean that they mean it?  And do these politicians bring to focus their fellow politicians that are not doing the right thing?

Chuck DeVore — March 09, 2009 — In the wee hours of the morning on February 19, 2009, Assemblyman

Chuck DeVore confronts his fellow lawmakers as they attempt to pass the largest state tax hike in U.S. history on Californians to deal with the vast overspending, redundancy and waste in the California State Budget. Assemblyman DeVore predicts that they will be right back where they started because the projected revenue increases will not be there since spending has risen too high and government is not being reformed.

 

 

If the citizens could only believe in what the politicians say!

 

By the way ... Do you believe him?

----ooo----

'Qualified Supreme Court Nominee?'

'Qualified Supreme Court Nominee?'

People can you see how the "Socialists are continually chipping away at our democracy"?

That's on the outside, look closely on the inside ... "A democratic party 'radical decision' person, if confirmed will help change the course of this country"   Remember what your president Barack Hussein Obama said in his campaign.  When elected I will change this country ... and this is how he is doing it.  One major dicision after another to change The United States of America, forever!

Tony Perkins  ( www.frcaction.org )

The worst kept secret in Washington seemed to be who President Obama would nominate to the Supreme Court. In his official announcement nominating her for the nation's highest court the President called Elena Kagan one of our "nation's foremost legal minds," and a "superb solicitor general." Her known record speaks otherwise. She has the least amount of experience of any nominee in the last three decades. Her judicial experience is zero, as is her real-world experience, having spent most of her career in academia or working as a Democratic Party insider. (She did serve on an advisory committee for Goldman Sachs during the financial meltdown of 2007!) Her tenure as Dean of Harvard Law School is marked by kicking the military off campus during the height of the Iraq War, a move that even Ruth Bader Ginsburg ruled was wrong-headed. Ms. Kagan's incredibly hostile view of the military suggests she is out of touch with mainstream sensibilities and obedience to the rule of law. Recently, in her brief tenure as Solicitor General, she argued that the federal government has the power, under campaign finance laws, to ban certain books and pamphlets. Responding to this argument of Ms. Kagan, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote, "As a free-floating test for First Amendment coverage, that (proposition) is startling and dangerous."

Ms. Kagan has called for the Senate to use the Supreme Court confirmation hearings "to engage nominees in meaningful discussion of legal issues," and that a nominee's views on issues are fair game to be discussed. She should be evaluated by the U.S. Senate with the very standards she set for this process. During her confirmation hearings for Solicitor General, Ms. Kagan found it difficult to be forthcoming with her answers. That should not be permitted when she is considered for a permanent position on our nation's highest court. Let your Senators know that Elena Kagan needs to fully answer the many questions people have regarding her record.

 

Sad Isn't It?

----ooo----

I'm Sorry I Didn't Study History

I'm Sorry I Didn't Study History ... I even thought is was unnecessary because "that was water under the bridge" and you can't change it.  Furthermore I saw it as boring!  Now I am sorry for that dumb idea.  Now at this time in my life I am trying to make up for it and studying as much as I can.

Great men and women that established the backbone of this county, now need to be studied more than ever ... because The United States of America and The Constitution and the Freedom that these documents support, need to be reborn.  This historical Inaugural Address by Thomas Jefferson is profound.  Within the whole picture of things ...  It wasn't that long ago.  If you don't have time to read the entire speech, at least scroll down to a very important point in bold type.  Thomas Jefferson wants government to stay small as possible so the citizens can keep the money they earn, versus being taxed to death like today's governmental regime want to do.

Thank You for reading this ... Commentary by Roger Merrill  www.realhonestnews.com

----<>----

Thomas Jefferson Our Third President ... Thomas Jefferson, "First Inaugural Address" (1801)

Some historians call the election of 1800, the Revolution of 1800.  It marked the first transfer of power from one political party - the elitist Federalists led by John Adams -  to another - the more democratic Democratic-Republicans (referred to as the Republicans) led by Thomas Jefferson .  Jefferson delivered the following address upon being sworn in the Nations third president. As you read, think about in what way the speech reflects Jefferson's political ideology.  Also notice the efforts that Jefferson makes to defuse party conflict and allay the Federalists who fear Jefferson and Democratic-Republican rule.

 

Thomas Jefferson, March 4, 1801

Friends and Fellow-Citizens:

Called upon to undertake the duties of the first executive office of our country, I avail myself of the presence of that portion of my fellow-citizens which is here assembled to express my grateful thanks for the favor with which they have been pleased to look toward me, to declare a sincere consciousness that the task is above my talents, and that I approach it with those anxious and awful presentiments which the greatness of the charge and the weakness of my powers so justly inspire. A rising nation, spread over a wide and fruitful land, traversing all the seas with the rich productions of their industry, engaged in commerce with nations who feel power and forget right, advancing rapidly to destinies beyond the reach of mortal eye--when I contemplate these transcendent objects, and see the honor, the happiness, and the hopes of this beloved country committed to the issue, and the auspices of this day, I shrink from the contemplation, and humble myself before the magnitude of the undertaking.

Utterly, indeed, should I despair did not the presence of many whom I here see remind me that in the other high authorities provided by our Constitution I shall find resources of wisdom, of virtue, and of zeal on which to rely under all difficulties. To you, then, gentlemen, who are charged with the sovereign functions of legislation, and to those associated with you, I look with encouragement for that guidance and support which may enable us to steer with safety the vessel in which we are all embarked amidst the conflicting elements of a troubled world.

During the contest of opinion through which we have passed the animation of discussions and of exertions has sometimes worn an aspect which might impose on strangers unused to think freely and to speak and to write what they think; but this being now decided by the voice of the nation, announced according to the rules of the Constitution, all will, of course, arrange themselves under the will of the law, and unite in common efforts for the common good. All, too, will bear in mind this sacred principle, that though the will of the majority is in all cases to prevail, that will to be rightful must be reasonable; that the minority possess their equal rights, which equal law must protect, and to violate would be oppression. Let us, then, fellow-citizens, unite with one heart and one mind.

Let us restore to social intercourse that harmony and affection without which liberty and even life itself are but dreary things. And let us reflect that, having banished from our land that religious intolerance under which mankind so long bled and suffered, we have yet gained little if we countenance a political intolerance as despotic, as wicked, and capable of as bitter and bloody persecutions. During the throes and convulsions of the ancient world, during the agonizing spasms of infuriated man, seeking through blood and slaughter his long- lost liberty, it was not wonderful that the agitation of the billows should reach even this distant and peaceful shore; that this should be more felt and feared by some and less by others, and should divide opinions as to measures of safety. But every difference of opinion is not a difference of principle. We have called by different names brethren of the same principle. We are all Republicans, we are all Federalists. If there be any among us who would wish to dissolve this Union or to change its republican form, let them stand undisturbed as monuments of the safety with which error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to combat it. I know, indeed, that some honest men fear that a republican government can not be strong, that this Government is not strong enough; but would the honest patriot, in the full tide of successful experiment, abandon a government which has so far kept us free and firm on the theoretic and visionary fear that this Government, the world's best hope, may by possibility want energy to preserve itself? I trust not. I believe this, on the contrary, the strongest Government on earth. I believe it the only one where every man, at the call of the law, would fly to the standard of the law, and would meet invasions of the public order as his own personal concern. Sometimes it is said that man can not be trusted with the government of himself. Can he, then, be trusted with the government of others? Or have we found angels in the forms of kings to govern him? Let history answer this question.

Let us, then, with courage and confidence pursue our own Federal and Republican principles, our attachment to union and representative government. Kindly separated by nature and a wide ocean from the exterminating havoc of one quarter of the globe; too high-minded to endure the degradations of the others; possessing a chosen country, with room enough for our descendants to the thousandth and thousandth generation; entertaining a due sense of our equal right to the use of our own faculties, to the acquisitions of our own industry, to honor and confidence from our fellow-citizens, resulting not from birth, but from our actions and their sense of them; enlightened by a benign religion, professed, indeed, and practiced in various forms, yet all of them inculcating honesty, truth, temperance, gratitude, and the love of man; acknowledging and adoring an overruling Providence, which by all its dispensations proves that it delights in the happiness of man here and his greater happiness hereafter--with all these blessings, what more is necessary to make us a happy and a prosperous people? Still one thing more, fellow-citizens--a wise and frugal Government, which shall restrain men from injuring one another, shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good government, and this is necessary to close the circle of our felicities.

About to enter, fellow-citizens, on the exercise of duties which comprehend everything dear and valuable to you, it is proper you should understand what I deem the essential principles of our Government, and consequently those which ought to shape its Administration. I will compress them within the narrowest compass they will bear, stating the general principle, but not all its limitations. Equal and exact justice to all men, of whatever state or persuasion, religious or political; peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none; the support of the State governments in all their rights, as the most competent administrations for our domestic concerns and the surest bulwarks against antirepublican tendencies; the preservation of the General Government in its whole constitutional vigor, as the sheet anchor of our peace at home and safety abroad; a jealous care of the right of election by the people--a mild and safe corrective of abuses which are lopped by the sword of revolution where peaceable remedies are unprovided; absolute acquiescence in the decisions of the majority, the vital principle of republics, from which is no appeal but to force, the vital principle and immediate parent of despotism; a well disciplined militia, our best reliance in peace and for the first moments of war, till regulars may relieve them; the supremacy of the civil over the military authority; economy in the public expense, that labor may be lightly burthened; the honest payment of our debts and sacred preservation of the public faith; encouragement of agriculture, and of commerce as its handmaid; the diffusion of information and arraignment of all abuses at the bar of the public reason; freedom of religion; freedom of the press, and freedom of person under the protection of the habeas corpus, and trial by juries impartially selected. These principles form the bright constellation which has gone before us and guided our steps through an age of revolution and reformation. The wisdom of our sages and blood of our heroes have been devoted to their attainment. They should be the creed of our political faith, the text of civic instruction, the touchstone by which to try the services of those we trust; and should we wander from them in moments of error or of alarm, let us hasten to retrace our steps and to regain the road which alone leads to peace, liberty, and safety.

I repair, then, fellow-citizens, to the post you have assigned me. With experience enough in subordinate offices to have seen the difficulties of this the greatest of all, I have learnt to expect that it will rarely fall to the lot of imperfect man to retire from this station with the reputation and the favor which bring him into it. Without pretensions to that high confidence you reposed in our first and greatest revolutionary character, whose preeminent services had entitled him to the first place in his country's love and destined for him the fairest page in the volume of faithful history, I ask so much confidence only as may give firmness and effect to the legal administration of your affairs. I shall often go wrong through defect of judgment. When right, I shall often be thought wrong by those whose positions will not command a view of the whole ground. I ask your indulgence for my own errors, which will never be intentional, and your support against the errors of others, who may condemn what they would not if seen in all its parts. The approbation implied by your suffrage is a great consolation to me for the past, and my future solicitude will be to retain the good opinion of those who have bestowed it in advance, to conciliate that of others by doing them all the good in my power, and to be instrumental to the happiness and freedom of all.

Relying, then, on the patronage of your good will, I advance with obedience to the work, ready to retire from it whenever you become sensible how much better choice it is in your power to make. And may that Infinite Power which rules the destinies of the universe lead our councils to what is best, and give them a favorable issue for your peace and prosperity.

 

 

---- 0000 ----

VAT = Value Added Tax = Breaking The Back of America

VAT  =   Value Added Tax  =  Breaking The Back of America!  The Progressive Socialists Obama Regime.

Obama is accomplishing everything he said he would do if voted into Presidency.  Barack Hussein Obama didn't lie.  Obama in his campaign look you right in the eye, without a blink, and said "I'm going to level the financial playing field" and Barack Hussein Obama is doing just that.

I hope the BASTARDS that voted for Obama are satisfied with the success of this Progressive Socialists Regime! 

At mock speed, this administration has "voted in" spending programs, and tax programs that can never be reversed.  People, the money you make, for the most part, is going to go to the government, you know "The Black Hole, where your hard earned money disappears".  You will be able to keep just enough money to subsists.

Don't you see this ... The Obama Regime is Growing as fast as humanly possible.  Maybe so fast that you can't see the destruction of our (American Citizens) freedom, and the destruction of our Constitution.

Today Paul Volcker "In the Back Pocket of the Obama Administration" sent up a trial balloon to start the TAX COLLECTION program for more of your money in the form of taxing everything you purchase, EVERTHING.

LEARN AS MUCH AS YOU CAN ABOUT "VAT" BECAUSES THIS TAX WILL DEPELEATE HUGH AMOUTS OF YOUR DISPOSLIBLE INCOME.

“Those Who Fail to Study History are Doomed to Repeat It.”

“Those Who Fail to Study History are Doomed to Repeat It."

 

Winston Churchill

 

Never Truer Words Have Been Spoken!

March, Third, Two Thousand Ten ... Timeless Isn't It?

 

 

----0----

 

 

"The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings;

the inherent vice of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries." 

 

Winston Churchill 

 

----0----

 

 

Socialism is a philosophy of failure,

the creed of ignorance,

and the gospel of envy,

its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.

 

Winston Churchill

 

 

----0----

Question: Who Am I? Answer: Frustrated American Citizen!

Question: Who Am I? 

Answer: Frustrated American Citizen! Why? ... Because of all the political things that are happening in this country today.

I often think of my ancestors, as having the 'good life' working the farms and digging in copper mines.  However I suppose the argument would be ... maybe they had a "Simple Life" but not the "Good Life".

At sixty four years old, should I be thinking about 'just me'? or should I be thinking about my country?  With these basic questions, I need a simple answer.

If it is all about me, should I give a 'Rip' about this country?

Well consider this "I Am This Country"!  I have worked hard for a lot of years to support (paying taxes and voting) this countries agenda (FREEDOM) and now it feels like the country is turning on me.  You know!  Like deteriorating, right in front of me!  This is extremely frustrating!

Can this country, The United States of America, ever go back to the "simple life"?  and still be the "Greatest Country in the World"?  Supporting the principals of "Freedom - Constitution - Bill of Rights, for the people"!

We need politicians that stick to the original written rules and not bending the rules of The United States Constitution.

In addition, the often radical interpretation of these original rules (The Constitution of The United States of America) by the Supreme Court and with the support of the politicians further disrupt our "Freedom".

Many Washington politicians including the President have expressed that the Constitution of the United States of America is a living thing and it should evolve to fit the times.  Now!  If that bothers you, we are getting somewhere.

This country needs to return to a "Conservative Country".  Without a doubt, The United States of America, is the most FREE in the world.  Freedom to do what you want and to be what you want.  However the 'FREE' ironically comes at a price.

Today, in this complex world the principals that go with "Freedom" are loosing ground.  People are not paying attention to the cost of freedom.

Politicians today are "selling out" the American Citizens.  That's because the American Citizens are not paying attention to how Politicians are passing bills. Passing bills today, do two things, Regulate (Control of your life) and spend money (Taxing You).  "Total control of your life".  Now! If this bothers you ... We are really getting somewhere.

So if you understand this so far ... It won't be hard to understand the incredible control of all aspects of the "American Population".  Soon, we will be considered a flock of sheep, with multiple Shepard's (Our Washington Politicians).  I personally want to call this control "Socialists Control" however a different and growing interpretation is ... "Progressive".  The definition of a "Progressive Agenda" is socialism that eats away at freedom one "Freedom" at a time.  Not in a big hurry, only the big goal in focus "Socialism".

In the "Progressive" time, we as American Citizens, will not have a vote?  Just a radical thought!

I don't know if there is enough American Citizens out there in The United States of America today, that could band together with a 'radical' simple agenda? ... Washington, give us back the America that our founding fathers put together with the "Constitution of the United States of America"?

Washington ... Give us back the "Constitution of The United States of America".

Washington Please ... Give us back the "Constitution of The United States of America".

Roger Merrill     contributing editor to  www.RealHonestNews.com

----0----